Disco-M Scan-Speak Discovery D2604/833000 (WG) and 22W/4534G00

17 thoughts too "Disco-M Scan-Speak Discovery D2604/833000 (WG) and 22W/4534G00"

1. The speaker I'll build soon, I'm absolutely convinced of the thing! However, the Baumappe Felbi without his construction report is hardly to use, because a beautiful appearance as the Cinetor is missing and you hardly recognize anything on the inner model, especially the Erkentniss is missing where which bracing comes from and how the thick front wall is built! Also the material thicknesses are missing. It would be nice if there will be a further improvement. Otherwise, I'm very impressed, even from the switch!

   mfg, Nils

   Reply

   1. Hello Nils
      The tree cap has been updated. Thanks for the hint.
      Concerning. readability: View the PDF in full size!

      Have fun with the discos 🙂

      Reply

2. “For me, a dissecting knife, a work tool and actually (with sub) the end of the flagpole. At the top, great cinema! "

   ("Bass" in DIY HIFI forum)

   Reply

3. Impressions from the “Taxi Race” on March 10.03.2018th, XNUMX in Vienna

   ... not only my P / L winner, but also an LS that I would put in my living room immediately if I weren't already well equipped.
   not so full in the face at the first moment, but very relaxed, laid back, without lacking in dynamics or details anything.
   sovereign easy.
   ...
   the discoM comes pretty close to the egg-laying woolly milk-pig - even at an angle it hardly loses any of its balance. loud and quiet simply a round thing for every musical material.

   ("Nical" in DIY HIFI forum)

   little yellow cab vs. disco-M:

   LYC: slightly center-stressed, unfortunately also quaerkiger. slight bloodless. on the one hand plays more superficially, but at the same time the playback is a bit more distant.
   disco-M: a bodily, slightly longer-term vote. in the middle of the present, nevertheless more pleasant than at the LYC.

   All in all, these two LS are quite close to each other at low volume, * the distance is significantly smaller than expected * - the comparison of the previous compilation had suggested something different.
   except when it gets louder ...

   ("Lord of the Rings" in Hifi-Forum)

   Optically, the madness sets the Disco-M above all a vocal range before the unparalleled seeks. It sounds real, realistic and the voices are very fresh and fruity. Of course, music only sounds radiant and crisp if the recording pretends so, so the highlights are more likely to be in the middle than the highs. The bass is crisp but not particularly deep and neutral loud.

   ("Musikhase" in Hifi-Forum)

   Reply

4. “With its linearly smooth frequency response and razor-sharp image, the Disco-M showed where Barthel gets the must. Spatially excellent image also on the side of the sofa "

   ("Herr_der_ringe" in Hifi-Forum)

   Reply

5. Hi Alexander,

   can you show a graph where the driver's phases (before, at the crossover point, and after) are displayed, as well as drivers delay (as shown here https://heissmann-acoustics.de/en/dxt-mon-vs-neumann -kh-120a / # comment-485)?

   Thanks in advance.

   Cheers,

   Reply

   1. Hi Boban
      Here the phase plot:
      
      driver delay:
      stay tuned ...

      Reply

      1. Hi Alex,

         Thank you. Looks good 🙂

         Cheers,

         Reply

      2. Hi Alexander,

         can you post diagram for driver delay?

         Thanks.

         BR,

         Reply

         1. Hi Boban
            Here you are:
            

            Best regards

            Reply

6. hello, would have to ask what price class with ner finished box are the disco m comparable? Find two new studio monitors and would like to build them myself to save costs. I'm not at all sure if they would be an improvement. Can't hear a sample anywhere. At the moment I have a pair of Adam f7 because there is simply a lack of resolution and there are other things I don't know / have heard ...

   Reply

7. Can it be build with a more standard baffle, like the Cinetor-Evo, without changing the cross-over?

   Reply

   1. I would not suggest to do that. It would result in a remarkably worse directional behavior.

      Best regards

      Reply

8. Is there an impedance correction for Suzie Q and Disco M?
   Got a small room with a 23 watt push-pull KT88 triode amplifier

   Reply

   1. Hi Patrick
      Yes, it is available for all speakers, on request for the construction folder.

      Regards

      Reply

9. Is there an impedance correction for Suzie Q and Disco M?
   Got a small room with a 23 watt push-pull KT88 triode amplifier.

   Reply

   1. Hello Patrick
      Yes there is!

      Reply